....................................

June 2008
May 2008
February 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
April 2007
March 2007
January 2007
October 2006
September 2006
June 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002



....................................

Play and Listen
The Price of Babies and Bootlaces
Small Population (in the vacuum)
Leaves and Sons
The Persistent Dilemma
presidential press
the radio
Pitchfork Review (and the pumpkin ritual)
benjamin and the dump
Earrings, Blogs (privacy?), and Recorded Things



....................................



Powered by
Movable Type 2.63

  « the inherent sensitivity of eyes | Main | here. »  

January 06, 2004

will the bush burn?

and as the new year warms its legs and begins its run, my mind drifts ahead to the forthcoming elections. perhaps there is hope after all.

Posted by jeff pitcher at January 6, 2004 02:20 PM

....................................


COMMENTS

Although aware of American domestic issues, I can't speak fluently to the bush's internal policies. I do however hope that, come next November, we can all hold hands and watch the bush burning. It will be a "weenie roast" to look forward to.

Posted by: Karin at January 7, 2004 08:18 PM

If the Democrats don't stop bickering like cheerleaders running for prom queen our weenie roast may be rained out. Why is that that evil can show a united front why humanity scatters itself in hysteria?

Posted by: summer at January 8, 2004 04:57 PM

This all seems absurd to me. Democrats or Republicans--it there really any difference. It was a Democrat (Bill Clinton), not a Republican, who started us on the heavy hard road to globalization. Is Dean our hero or just another schmuck who stood in the presidential line. If only there were a law that stated in clear, precise language that each and every presidential candidate would be fucked violently in the ass. It would need to be right before they filed their candidacy--not after. This would probably weed out all but the most power hungry. At least then we'd know who we were dealing with.

Posted by: Christian Kiefer at January 8, 2004 10:26 PM

just another one of the reasons I love you Christian. :)

Posted by: summer at January 9, 2004 04:47 PM

just another one of the reasons I love you Christian. :)

Posted by: summer at January 9, 2004 04:47 PM

saying that Clinton is responsible for globalization is pretty much like saying Gore invented the internet. The ass drubbing comment is pretty funny. The futile indifference I see all over the place is sad. And people who don't try and make a difference deserve the ass fucking George Bush has been giving them.

Posted by: trex at January 12, 2004 01:20 PM
   


©2005 jeff pitcher